119th Congress Environmental Protection
S. 1907: Plant Biostimulant Act of 2025
Introduced
- Introduced (completed)
- Passed Senate (not reached)
- Passed House (not reached)
- To the President (not reached)
- Became law (not reached)
Summary
This bill excludes certain plant biostimulants (i.e., substances, microorganisms, or mixtures thereof that support a plant's natural processes independently of the nutrient content) from regulation as pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
Specifically, the bill excludes biological plant biostimulants (or those that are synthetic but structurally similar to substances of biological origin) from being classified as plant regulators, which are substances regulated as pesticides under FIFRA. Additionally, the bill excludes nutritional chemicals and plant biostimulants from being classified as nitrogen stabilizers, which are generally regulated as pesticides under FIFRA. The bill also establishes statutory definitions for plant biostimulants, nutritional chemicals, and vitamin hormone products.
The bill requires the Department of Agriculture to study and report on the types of plant biostimulants and practices of plant biostimulant use that best achieve certain results, such as increasing organic matter content.
Written by the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Roll calls
No roll call votes have been held on this bill.
Amendments
No amendments were offered to this bill.
Cosponsors
- Alejandro Padilla D-CAOriginal
- Ted Budd R-NC
- Elissa Slotkin D-MI
Who scored on this bill
- 1Roger Marshall SponsorDrew cross-party cosponsors, introduced2 events+6
See all scorers and every scoring event
Introductions and cosponsorships count toward weekly caps and show no points.
Other bills by Roger Marshall
- S. 2403: Retire through Ownership Act
- S. 2355: Patients Deserve Price Tags Act
- S. 3799: Healthy Start Reauthorization Act of 2026
- S. 222: Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025
- S.J.Res. 42: Disapproval of Food and Nutrition Service rule: Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint Processing-Policy Update
- S.J.Res. 9: Disapproval of United States Fish and Wildlife Service rule: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status with Section 4(d) Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population Segment
History
- Introduced in the Senate by Roger Marshall.
Show the full action history (2 actions)
- Introduced in Senate
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.


